|
WHY CAN'T WE LOVE THEM BOTH
by Dr. and Mrs. J.C. Willke
CHAPTER 9
HEALTH
MORE SPECIFICALLY, MENTAL HEALTH
In discussing abortion, and abortion for the
mothers health, it is absolutely crucial to know what "health" means,
legally and in practice, regarding abortion. "Health" was defined in detail by
the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court said that abortion could be performed: ". . . in
the light of all factors physical, emotion-al, psychological, familial, and the
womans age relevant to the well being of the patient. All these factors may
relate to health." Roe vs. Wade, January
22, 1973
And in its companion decision, "Maternity or additional
offspring may force upon the woman a distressful life and future. Psychological harm may
be imminent. Mental and physical health may be taxed by childcare. There is also the
distress for all concerned associated with the unwanted child, and there is the problem of
bringing a child into a family already unable, psychologically or otherwise, to care for
it." Doe vs. Bolton, January 22, 1973 44
In a concurring opinion,
Justice Douglas further elaborated what "health" meant when, in law, it related
to abortion. He detailed if she had to: "endure the discomforts of pregnancy; to
incur the pain, higher mortality rate, and aftereffects of childbirth; to abandon
educational plans; to sustain loss of income; to forego the satisfactions of careers; to
tax further mental and physical health in providing childcare, and in some cases, to bear
the lifelong stigma of unwed motherhood." Roe
vs. Wade, January 22, 1973
This definition of "health" has been adopted
internationally. As a result, in any nation, if abortion is al-lowed for the womans
"health," that country permits abortion on demand unless other aspects of its
laws add restrictions.
The World Health Organization of the United Nations defined it as
including social, emotional and economic well being of the woman as defined by the woman
herself.
Lets narrow it down to mental health, in the psychological sense, and
askare there mental health reasons for abortion?
No! The woman with mental health problems is far more likely to
experience post-abortion emotional and psychological problems than a more stable woman.
Four classic references here are these: "Women
with a history of psychiatric disturbance were three times as likely to have some
psychiatric disturbance" after an abortion as others who had no such history."
E. Greenglass, "Abortion & Psychiatric
Disturbance," Canadian Psych. Assn. Jour., vol. 21, no. 7, Nov. 1976, pp.
453-459
Dr. Charles Ford and his associates at UCLA
reported the same finding. "The more serious the psychiatric diagnosis, the less
beneficial was the abortion. " C. Ford et al.,
"Abortion, Is It a Therapeutic Procedure in Psychiatry?" JAMA, vol. 218,
no. 8, Nov. 22, 1971, pp. 1173-1178
"The more severely ill
the psychiatric patient, the worse is her post-abortion psychiatric state."
E. Sandberg, "Psychology of
Abortion" In Comprehensive
Handbook of Psychiatry, 3rd ed. Kaplan & Friedman Publishers, 1980
All of these support the original official statement of the World
Health Organization in 1970: "Serious mental disorders arise more often in women with
previous mental problems. Thus, the very women for whom legal abortion is considered
justified on psychiatric grounds are the ones who have the highest risk of post-abortion
psychiatric disorders."
Then "mental illness" as a reason for abortion is just an
excuse?
Precisely.
What
about psychological problems after abortion?
When your authors wrote Handbook on Abortion in 1971, there
were a few murmurings about post-abortion problems, but little was known. We then saw the
negatives as mostly physical.
When we wrote Abortion: Questions & Answers in 1985,
physical damage, while still a major problem, was given less emphasis, and negative
psychological aftermath was being seriously investigated. With the publication of this
book, far more is known about what is now called Post Abortion Syndrome which clearly is a
post traumatic stress syndrome.
A Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome?
Yes. This type of problem was first seen in large
numbers in Vietnam veterans, but did not manifest it-self until a decade after they
returned. The same ten-year delay has been evident with abortion. T. Keane, Vietnam Vets Trauma disorder
level at 15%, Am. Med. News, L. Abraham, Dec. 2, 1988, p. 2
What is Post Abortion Syndrome (PAS)?
Many women are very ambivalent about getting aborted but do go
ahead. Those around her told her (and she told herself) that it wouldnt bother her.
When symptoms occur, she tells herself it cant be the abortion causing them, and
then into play come her two major psychological defense mechanisms:
Repression and Denial.
For some this works successfully. For others it shades off to
manageable distress, to severe and life-changing upset and even to suicide.
There is a delay?
Yes! Her initial response in most cases is a feeling of relief.
Then, with repression and denial, she avoids the problem, usually for years 5 years
is common, 10 or 20 not unusual.
But then, for some, the negative feelings bubble up and break
through. Often the precipitating event is: she has a baby, or a close friend or relative
has a baby that she has close contact with. She finds out she is sterile, or other
life-changing events.
What are the symptoms of PAS?
Guilt is ever present in many guises, along with regret, remorse,
shame, lowered self-esteem, insomnia, dreams and nightmares, flash backs, anniversary
reactions. There often is hostility, and even hatred, toward men. This can include her
husband, and she may be-come sexually dysfunctional. Crying, despair and depression are
usual, even at times with suicide attempts.
Recourse to alcohol or drugs to mask the pain is frequent, sometimes
leading to sexual promiscuity. There is also a numbing and coldness in place of more
normal warmth and maternal tenderness.
Is this due to religious guilt feelings?
Perhaps in some it is a factor, but most women re-ported on in the
early studies were unchurched at the time.
Perhaps they had seen pictures of fetuses?
Again, not most. Most did not know "it" was a
"baby" when they aborted.
But Ive heard that the American Psychological Association says
that PAS doesnt exist.
This group has been strongly pro-abortion, and this definitely
colors its thinking. But during the past decade or more, there have been dozens of
national conferences on PAS. There are many professional articles and about 15 books
adding more and more authentication to its existence and knowledge about it. Further,
every one of the almost 4,000 pro-life pregnancy help centers in the U.S. now has found
that an increasing percentage of their time is now devoted to treating PAS women.
But so many studies deny
PAS.
True, and most are invalid for two reasons:
(1) Timing: Most studies have investigated feelings for only
a few weeks or months post abortion when she is still feeling relief that her problem is
gone. Since the delay before PAS symptoms intrude is often 5 years or more, these studies
are invalid.
(2) Superficiality: Her repression and denial push
this deep into her subconsciousness. If the survey is done by questionnaire or single
interview, she routinely denies problems. These studies are invalid. Only by lengthy
psychological testing and counseling can she often admit to some symptoms, much less tie
them to the abortion she so desperately wants to forget.
You mean most studies miss PAS?
But most polls show few emotional problems
only a sense of relief! Yes, but "What women really feel at the deepest level
about abortion is very different from what they say in reply to questionnaires." A
Canadian study polled a group of women who had previously completed a questionnaire in
which they denied having problems from an abortion. One half of this group was randomly
chosen for in-depth psychotherapy." What emerged from psychotherapy was in sharp
contrast [to the questionnaires], even when the woman had rationally considered abortion
to be inevitable, the only course of action." It was demonstrated that the conscious,
rationalized decision for an abortion can co-exist with profound rejection of it at the
deepest level. Despite surface appearances, abortion leaves behind deeper feelings
"invariably of intense pain, involving bereavement and a sense of identification with
the foetus." I. Kent et al.,
"Emotional Sequelae of Elective Abortion," British College of Med. Jour.,
vol. 20, no. 4, April 1978 I. Kent, "Abortion Has Profound Impact," Family
Practice News, June 1980, p. 80
Are there valid studies?
Yes, and two meta-analyses: James Rogers, who
carefully examined over 400 published studies, pointed to the almost universal use of
"poor methodology and research design" and "grossly substandard power
characteristics." He concluded that "the question of psychological sequelae of
abortion is not closed." J. Rogers et al., "Validity
of Existing Controlled Studies Examining the Psychological Sequelae of Abortion," Perspectives on
Science and Christian Faith, vol. 39, no. 1, Mar. 1987, pp. 20-29 49
Another concurred that existing research is
methodologically flawed and that women who abort show more negative outcomes than those
who deliver their babies. E. Posavac et al., "Some
Problems . . . Psychological Effects of Abortion," Psychology & Health, 5,
13-23
How about specific studies?
An excellent study thoroughly explaining and
documenting PAS by the team that named this entity is:
A. Speckhard & V. Rue, Post. Ab. Syndrome: An
Emerging Public Health Concern, J. of Soc. Issues, vol. 48, no. 3, 1992 and E.J. Angelo, Psych. Sequelae of Abortion, Linacre Quart. vol. 59:2,
May 1992 and P. Ney et al., Mental Health & Abortion, Psychiat. Jour., U. of Ottawa, vol. 14, no. 4, 1989 and L. DeVeber et al., Post Abortion Grief, Psychol.
Sequel. of Ab., Humane Med., Vol. 7, no. 3, Aug. 91, p. 203
Two excellent monographs are:
J. Brende, Post-Trauma Sequelae..Abortion.., Trauma
Rec. Pub., 458 Morning Glory Dr., Sparta, GA 31087
V. Rue, Post Abortion Trauma, Life Dynamics,
1994, P.O. Box 185, Lewisville, TX 75067
Also a quarterly newsletter from the
Association for Interdisciplinary Research in Values & Social Change available from
NRLC, 419 7th St. NW, Washington, DC 20004.
Does it ever lead to
suicide?
Suicide is rare among pregnant women, but much more common after
induced abortion. It is never re-ported under maternal mortality from abortion, of course,
even though it is causative.
"The suicide rate after an abortion was three times
the general suicide rate and six times that associated with birth.... the rate for women
following a live birth was 5.9 per 100,000; following miscarriage 18.1; following abortion
34.7." They note that women frequently get short term "post-natal blues after
having a baby, but that this rarely translates into suicide, and that the initial stress
of having a child is transitional, the over-all effect having a positive effect on
womens health." M. Gissler, Abortion/Suicide
Link,Br. Med. J., Dec. 6, 1996
Then it is rare among pregnant women?
In Abortion: Questions & Answers your authors de-tail
5 studies clearly showing this. One comment may suffice: "The fetus in utero must be
a protective mechanism. Perhaps women are reluctant to take another life with them when
they do this."
How about after abortion?
In the above book your authors also give the findings
of Suiciders Anonymous, and that: suicide post-abortion is several times more common than
post-delivery. British Medical Jour., 1996
What of Psychosis afterwards?
This has not changed since Dr. M. Sims original paper. He
stated that, compared to post-delivery disturbances, post-abortion psychoses are much more
serious, last longer, and are more likely to recur. They are more often the
"hard" cases. M. Sim, "Abortion and the
Psychiatrist," British Med. Jour., vol. 2, 1963, pp. 145-148
How
about an example from a non-Christian culture?
In Japan, where abortion has been legal and accepted
for over four decades, a common custom is to conduct Mizuyo Kuyo services in honor of the
god Jizo. This god has been made the patron saint of infants who died of starvation,
abortion, or infanticide. Small baby statues, in his honor, are bought and dressed. Then,
in a Buddhist Temple, rites of sorrow and reconciliation are carried out.
Does abortion have any negative effects on her other children?
In some cases a definite "Survivor Syndrome" has been
demonstrated. Children usually know that mother is pregnant. They also know when she
"gets unpregnant." This may cause Survivors Syndrome, similar to that of
Jews who survived the holocaust. It is an irrational but real guilt at "why was I
saved and why were they killed." Dr. Ney has written about this. Dr. Edward Sheridan
of Georgetown University has observed also a fear and mistrust of the mother. Originally,
a small child, sensing a siblings arrival, doesnt welcome it. "When the
baby suddenly disappears, the frightened child may get a warped sense of his own power to
will people away. Or, if he knows that his mother was an active agent in doing
away with the sibling, he begins to fear her." A simple explanation of this was
published in: L. Bond, "The Surviving Sibling," Natl RTL
News, Sept. 25, 1986.
It is also closely associated with child abuse: Dr. Phillip Ney,
Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Christ Church, New Zealand, and of later at
the University of Calgary, Canada, while still at the University of
British Columbia, published a widely read study of this. His analysis clearly pointed to
the fact that abortion (and its acceptance of the violence of killing the unborn) lowered
a parents psychic resistance to violence and abuse of the born. P.
Ney, "Relationship Between Abortion & Child Abuse," Canada Jour. Psychiatry,
vol. 24, 1979, pp. 610-620
Is there treatment for PAS?
Yes, but it is not easy. We first must note that only a few
doctors are sensitized to the necessary dynamics of treatment. Specifically, most
psychiatrists and psychologists arent much help, nor are psychotropic drugs. This
requires a gradual healing process, and during it she must have ongoing close emotional
support from one or several people who do not have to be trained professionals.
As of the late 1990s, the place to start is your pro-life pregnancy
help center. They can either work with her themselves and/or will know who can.
Basically, there are five steps to the healing process:
(1) Counter the denial. Bring this back into her consciousness and
admit she was a party to killing her own baby.
- She must grieve over her lost child tears, mourning as for
another loved one.
(3) Seek Divine forgiveness. This was not expected but seems
essential for almost every woman.
(4) Forgive others. Difficult, again, but some of this is needed to
complete the healing and get rid of her long repressed anger.
(5) Forgive herself. Not many get this far, but
those who do have real inner peace. What is absolutely crucial at every step in the above
is compassionate empathy, support and understanding from one or more persons around her. J. Willke, P.A.S. Five Steps on How You Can Help, Life Issues Connector, Mar. 1996
There is healing in the
mourning
|